Navigation Audits – Under or Over the Bridge
In the recent past, much emphasis is being placed on Navigational Audits, now that this procedure forms a requirement of the TMSA and are becoming more and more common in other trades too, such as bulk and container carriers.
While the audit itself is extremely important,
equally is the choice of surveyor and the company
employed to have this carried out.
There is still a lacuna – There is currently
NO INDUSTRY requirement NOR standard to audit
navigational activities. A ship spends possibly
90% of its time underway at sea where navigation
is the principle activity being undertaken,
but unfortunately does not enjoy the same proportion
of scrutiny.
It is only the Oil Majors through their TMSA
initiative that make any reference to navigational
audits and then these are not exactly requirements,
nor do they specify frequency nor standard to
be adopted.
Going further, for the world fleet, it is assumed
that Navigation will be audited under the ISM
Code requirements. The external auditors for
the ISM DOC are normally Class Surveyors who
are also normally from an Engineering background.
As such they are hardly qualified to audit navigation.
Ask yourself how many questions directed at
Navigation were last brought up at your DOC
audit?
In a similar way, the same auditors are responsible
for auditing navigation during shipboard ISM
SMC audits. The frequency of these audits is
every two and a half years and in that time,
there could have been 7 or more different Masters.
A reliable finding can hardly be achieved. There
is no requirement in the ISM Code for even to
sail on the ships.
The vast majority of audits of navigation are
limited to in port only, where the audit is
based on records alone. Without intentionally
trying to hide incomplete checks, ship’s officers
may not be recording the true picture of what
is happening and thus the audit results may
be skewed.
It is thus imperative that independent Navigation
audits must form part of a ship owners / managers
risk assessment modality, and Constellation
Marine services have the experience and wherewithal
to assist prudent operators achieve the level
of Navigation requirements to keep their ships
and crew safe at sea.
Rarely it is understood that Navigation is a
human activity – it falls squarely into the
Human Element sector. One of the problems of
audits is the best result a ship’s Master and
crew can achieve is a score – therefore a more
holistic approach to the audits are required
– encouraging the ship’s Master and officers
to feel professional about their own navigation.
Besides the exercise of filling up the standard
adopted checklist, a more fruitful principal
to adopt would be “far better a willing volunteer
than a conscript”. To that end we think any
shortcomings should be identified, the individuals
and group (Bridge Team) shown what is wrong
and why it is wrong and then allow them to put
corrected practices in place. Policy or procedural
“Non-Conformities” would be reported to the
company for follow up. Deviations from existing
shipboard procedures would be pointed out onboard
and the opportunity to correct these given to
the master’s and officers.
Our experience has shown we can create improvements
from the bottom up rather than top down. Many
officers have just never had the opportunity
to see how things should be done properly or
are aware of how they should be done.
Over the years, there have been numerous initiatives,
both in technical developments and training.
We now have sophisticated radars, ARPAs and
AIS to assist in avoiding collision; we have
GPS and ECDIS to provide continuous position
indication and monitoring. We even have VDRs
to record what is happening.
Training has been increased and now includes
Bridge Team Management and even sophisticated
CBT on some vessels.
But many of the navigational incidents are the
result of a failure to implement basic navigational
actions such as maintaining an “active” lookout,
plot other vessels and determine if risk of
collision exists – and take appropriate action
according to the COLREGs.
Constellation Marine services believe Risk Management and auditing can be used as tools to monitor and/or improve individual skills as well as those of the whole bridge team. Improvements to existing Safety Management Systems can also be identified within an audit carried out holistically rather than mechanically.